ceramic: is good thermal insulators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thermal insulators 1.00
is thermal insulators 0.99
is good insulators 0.93
is insulators 0.92
make good insulators 0.91
make insulators 0.91
be used as electrical insulators 0.91
be used as insulators 0.91
have low thermal conductivity 0.89
have thermal conductivity 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is good insulators)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic, is insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulators)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ceramic, have thermal conductivity)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as electrical insulators)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(ceramic, have thermal conductivity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used as insulators)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(ceramic, make insulators)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ceramic, make insulators)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ceramic, is insulators)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ceramic, make insulators)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ceramic, have low thermal conductivity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, make insulators)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ceramic, is insulators)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used as insulators)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is insulators)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used as insulators)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is insulators)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used as insulators)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ceramic, make good insulators)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ceramic, have low thermal conductivity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ceramic, have thermal conductivity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ceramic, is good insulators)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ceramic, have low thermal conductivity)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have low thermal conductivity)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have thermal conductivity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulators)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ceramic, is good thermal insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)