cervix: is short

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reproductive organ
Weight: 0.57
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.56
, organ
Weight: 0.56
, reproductive system
Weight: 0.54
Siblings uterus
Weight: 0.35
, vagina
Weight: 0.35
, ovary
Weight: 0.34
, breast
Weight: 0.34
, esophagus
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is short 1.00
appear short 0.88
is long 0.80
be short in pig 0.76
take long 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, appear short)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, be short in pig)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is long)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(esophagus, appear short)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(esophagus, appear short)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(esophagus, be short in pig)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(esophagus, be short in pig)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(esophagus, is long)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(esophagus, is long)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cervix, is short)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is short)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cervix, is short)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(esophagus, appear short)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(esophagus, be short in pig)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is short)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(esophagus, is long)