:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(breast, is soft)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is soft)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(uterus, is soft)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(uterus, is weak)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cervix, is soft)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cervix, is soft)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(breast, is soft)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(esophagus, is soft)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(uterus, is soft)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cervix, is soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(uterus, is weak)