cgi: be bad in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in movies 1.00
be in movies 0.95
be used in movies 0.93
be in movies expensive 0.91
be expensive on movies 0.91
be in movies created 0.88
compared to big movies 0.87
be in films 0.87
be in movies cost 0.86
compared to movies 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cgi, be in films)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cgi, be in films)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in films)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)