cgi: be expensive for tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive for tv 1.00
look worse on tv 0.85
looks on tv 0.85
be expensive on movies 0.81
be in movies expensive 0.81
be in expensive 0.81
be expensive 0.81
be do expensive 0.81
is expensive 0.80
be in movies cost 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cgi, looks on tv)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cgi, looks on tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cgi, looks on tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be do expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cgi, be in expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cgi, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cgi, be do expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cgi, be in expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cgi, be do expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cgi, be do expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cgi, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)