cgi: be expensive on movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive on movies 1.00
be in movies expensive 0.99
be in movies 0.93
be used in movies 0.92
be in movies cost 0.91
be bad in movies 0.91
be in movies unpopular 0.86
be in films 0.85
compared to big movies 0.85
be in movies created 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies unpopular)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies unpopular)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies unpopular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies unpopular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cgi, be in films)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cgi, be in films)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in films)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)