cgi: be in films

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in films 1.00
be in movies 0.93
be in film 0.91
be used in movies 0.89
be bad in movies 0.87
be in movies created 0.87
be in movies expensive 0.86
be expensive on movies 0.85
have impact on films budget 0.84
compared to movies 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cgi, be in films)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cgi, be in film)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in film)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(cgi, be in film)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in film)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cgi, have impact on films budget)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cgi, have impact on films budget)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in films)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cgi, be in films)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cgi, be in films)