cgi: be in movies created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in movies created 1.00
be used in movies 0.91
be in movies 0.91
be bad in movies 0.88
be in films 0.87
be in movies expensive 0.85
be expensive on movies 0.85
compared to movies 0.83
compared to big movies 0.83
be in movies cost 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cgi, be in films)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cgi, be in films)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in films)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)