cgi: be in movies expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in movies expensive 1.00
be expensive on movies 0.99
be in movies 0.93
be used in movies 0.92
be in movies cost 0.92
be bad in movies 0.91
be in movies unpopular 0.86
be in films 0.86
compared to big movies 0.85
be in movies created 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies unpopular)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies unpopular)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies unpopular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies unpopular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cgi, be in films)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cgi, be in films)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in films)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)