cgi: be in park good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in park good 1.00
be in park 0.96
be in jurassic park good 0.93
be in jurassic park 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cgi, be in park good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in park)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be in park)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cgi, be in park)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in jurassic park)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in jurassic park good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cgi, be in jurassic park)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cgi, be in jurassic park good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cgi, be in jurassic park good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in jurassic park)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in jurassic park good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cgi, be in jurassic park)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in park good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cgi, be in park good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cgi, be in park good)