cgi: be used terribly in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used terribly in movies 1.00
be used in movies 0.86
be bad in movies 0.85
be in movies expensive 0.84
be in movies 0.84
be expensive on movies 0.83
be in movies created 0.81
compared to big movies 0.80
is incredibly expensive 0.80
compared to movies 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cgi, is incredibly expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cgi, is incredibly expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cgi, is incredibly expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cgi, is incredibly expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used terribly in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, be used terribly in movies)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cgi, be used terribly in movies)