cgi: compared to movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
compared to movies 1.00
compared to big movies 0.96
be in movies 0.88
be used in movies 0.88
be bad in movies 0.86
be in movies expensive 0.85
be expensive on movies 0.84
be in movies created 0.83
be in films 0.83
be in movies cost 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to movies)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cgi, be used in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cgi, be used in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be used in movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cgi, be bad in movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies cost)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies created)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, be used in movies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cgi, be in films)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in films)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cgi, be in films)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in films)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cgi, compared to movies)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to movies)