cgi: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be expensive 0.99
be in expensive 0.98
be do expensive 0.93
is incredibly expensive 0.83
be in movies expensive 0.81
be expensive on movies 0.81
be expensive for tv 0.80
cost money 0.77
shows much cost 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cgi, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(thing, cost money)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cgi, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(thing, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(thing, cost money)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(thing, cost money)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cgi, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cgi, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cgi, be in expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cgi, be in expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cgi, be do expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cgi, be do expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cgi, be do expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movies expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive on movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cgi, is incredibly expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cgi, is incredibly expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be do expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cgi, is incredibly expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cgi, cost money)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cgi, cost money)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cgi, shows much cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cgi, shows much cost)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cgi, cost money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cgi, shows much cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cgi, is incredibly expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cgi, cost money)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cgi, shows much cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cgi, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thing, cost money)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cgi, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thing, cost money)