cgi: looks on tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
looks on tv 1.00
look worse on tv 0.88
be expensive for tv 0.85
look better on big screen 0.77
look better on screen 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cgi, looks on tv)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cgi, look better on screen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look better on screen)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cgi, look better on screen)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cgi, look better on screen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cgi, looks on tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cgi, looks on tv)