cgi: means more money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
means more money 1.00
means money 0.98
cost money 0.84
be in movie cost money 0.80
be do expensive 0.77
shows much cost 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(thing, cost money)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cgi, means more money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(thing, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(thing, cost money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(thing, cost money)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cgi, means more money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cgi, means more money)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cgi, means money)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cgi, means money)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cgi, means money)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cgi, cost money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cgi, be in movie cost money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cgi, cost money)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cgi, cost money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cgi, shows much cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cgi, shows much cost)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cgi, be do expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cgi, shows much cost)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cgi, cost money)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cgi, be do expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cgi, be do expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be do expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cgi, means money)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cgi, shows much cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cgi, means more money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cgi, means more money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thing, cost money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cgi, means more money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thing, cost money)