chair: be at build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seat
Weight: 0.66
, member
Weight: 0.63
, committee
Weight: 0.63
, object
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sofa bed
Weight: 0.65
, sofa
Weight: 0.63
, wheelchair
Weight: 0.56
, rocker
Weight: 0.51
, armchair
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at build 1.00
be find in build 0.93
be at office build 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chair, be at build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(committee, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at office build)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chair, be at build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chair, be at build)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(chair, be find in build)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(chair, be at office build)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chair, be find in build)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chair, be at office build)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at office build)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chair, be find in build)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(chair, be find in build)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chair, be at office build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chair, be at build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(committee, be at office build)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(chair, be at build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(committee, be at office build)