chalk: be used writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.52
, medium
Weight: 0.51
, drawing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings crayon
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32
, paper towel
Weight: 0.32
, sand
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used writing 1.00
be good writing 0.92
writing on surface 0.84
be good writing on surface 0.84
be good writing on surfaces 0.81
writing on hard surface 0.81
writing on surfaces 0.80
be good writing on hard surface 0.80
writing on hard surfaces 0.78
be good writing on hard surfaces 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(chalk, be used writing)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chalk, be good writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(chalk, be good writing on surface)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chalk, be good writing on hard surface)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chalk, be good writing on hard surfaces)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chalk, be good writing on surfaces)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chalk, be good writing on hard surfaces)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(chalk, be good writing on hard surface)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chalk, be good writing on hard surfaces)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chalk, be good writing on hard surface)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(chalk, be good writing on surface)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(chalk, be good writing on surfaces)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chalk, be good writing on hard surfaces)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(chalk, be good writing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(chalk, be good writing on hard surface)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chalk, be good writing on surface)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chalk, be good writing on surfaces)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chalk, be good writing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chalk, be good writing on surfaces)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chalk, be good writing on surface)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chalk, be good writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chalk, be used writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(chalk, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chalk, be used writing)