cham: be vs nuoc mam

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.40
, member
Weight: 0.32
, place
Weight: 0.30
, islam
Weight: 0.25
, example
Weight: 0.23
Siblings mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.29
, immanuel kant
Weight: 0.29
, jesse james
Weight: 0.29
, robert louis stevenson
Weight: 0.29
, adam smith
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs nuoc mam 1.00
is obtusa nana 0.81
is day noi dau 0.79
is goi cuon 0.79
is nem nuong brodard 0.79
is nem nuong 0.79
is ya 0.78
ya 0.78
is nem 0.76
nem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cham, is nem nuong brodard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cham, is nem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cham, ya)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cham, is ya)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cham, nem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cham, is goi cuon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cham, is nem nuong)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cham, is obtusa nana)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(cham, is obtusa nana)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cham, is nem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cham, nem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cham, is goi cuon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cham, ya)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cham, is ya)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(cham, is nem nuong brodard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cham, is obtusa nana)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cham, is nem nuong)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cham, is day noi dau)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cham, is goi cuon)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cham, ya)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cham, is ya)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cham, nem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cham, is nem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cham, is goi cuon)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cham, is nem nuong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cham, is nem nuong brodard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cham, is nem nuong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cham, is nem nuong brodard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cham, ya)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cham, is ya)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cham, nem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cham, is nem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cham, is obtusa nana)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cham, is day noi dau)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cham, is day noi dau)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cham, is day noi dau)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cham, be vs nuoc mam)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cham, be vs nuoc mam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cham, be vs nuoc mam)