chameleon: adapt to surroundings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
, lizard
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings creature
Weight: 0.33
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.33
, frog
Weight: 0.33
, red fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt to surroundings 1.00
adapt to environment 0.86
adapt 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lizard, adapt)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(species, adapt)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(species, adapt)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lizard, adapt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lizard, adapt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(species, adapt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, adapt to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lizard, adapt)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(species, adapt)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, adapt to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chameleon, adapt to environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(chameleon, adapt to environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chameleon, adapt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(chameleon, adapt to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chameleon, adapt)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chameleon, adapt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(species, adapt)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lizard, adapt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(red fox, adapt to environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(species, adapt)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, adapt to surroundings)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lizard, adapt)