chameleon: eat leaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
, lizard
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings creature
Weight: 0.33
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.33
, frog
Weight: 0.33
, red fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat leaves 1.00
eat 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chameleon, eat leaves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lizard, eat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chameleon, eat leaves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(lizard, eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lizard, eat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(creature, eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(frog, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lizard, eat)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(frog, eat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, eat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dinosaur, eat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, eat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(creature, eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creature, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(chameleon, eat leaves)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chameleon, eat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(chameleon, eat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chameleon, eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chameleon, eat leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lizard, eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(frog, eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dinosaur, eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lizard, eat)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(chameleon, eat leaves)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)