champagne: has state king

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.74
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
, bottle
Weight: 0.58
, drink
Weight: 0.57
Siblings glass bottle
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, red wine
Weight: 0.36
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state king 1.00
be named after kings 0.81
is queen 0.80
has state offence 0.80
be named after biblical kings 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, be named after kings)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, be named after biblical kings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(wine bottle, be named after biblical kings)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, be named after biblical kings)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wine bottle, be named after kings)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, be named after kings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(champagne, has state king)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(champagne, is queen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(champagne, is queen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is queen)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(champagne, is queen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(champagne, has state king)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(champagne, has state king)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(wine bottle, be named after kings)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(champagne, has state king)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wine bottle, be named after biblical kings)