champagne: is frozen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.74
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
, bottle
Weight: 0.58
, drink
Weight: 0.57
Siblings glass bottle
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, red wine
Weight: 0.36
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frozen 1.00
freeze 0.81
freeze different temperatures 0.76
freeze temperatures 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(vodka, freeze)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vodka, freeze different temperatures)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(vodka, freeze)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(vodka, freeze)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(vodka, freeze different temperatures)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(vodka, freeze different temperatures)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(champagne, is frozen)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(champagne, freeze)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(champagne, freeze)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(champagne, freeze)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(champagne, freeze)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is frozen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(champagne, is frozen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(vodka, freeze)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is frozen)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(vodka, freeze different temperatures)