channel: be different in different areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.59
, depression
Weight: 0.57
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radio station
Weight: 0.74
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.71
, television
Weight: 0.71
, stream
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different in different areas 1.00
be different in areas 0.97
be different 0.90
be different for different products 0.85
be different for products 0.78
be similar 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(structure, be different)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(depression, be similar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(channel, be different in different areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(depression, be similar)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(structure, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(structure, be different)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(depression, be similar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(structure, be different)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(depression, be similar)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(channel, be different in different areas)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different in areas)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(channel, be different in areas)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different for different products)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(channel, be different in areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(channel, be different in areas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different for products)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(channel, be similar)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(channel, be different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(channel, be different for different products)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(channel, be different for products)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(channel, be similar)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(channel, be different)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(channel, be different for different products)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(channel, be different for products)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(channel, be similar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(channel, be different for products)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(channel, be different)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(channel, be different for different products)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(channel, be similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(channel, be different in different areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(depression, be similar)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(structure, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(depression, be similar)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(channel, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(structure, be different)