chap: have expensive payments

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.52
, friend
Weight: 0.47
, gear
Weight: 0.45
, item
Weight: 0.43
Siblings gentleman
Weight: 0.34
, young man
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.34
, postman
Weight: 0.33
, policeman
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have expensive payments 1.00
have payments 0.96
cost money 0.78
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(thing, cost money)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(item, cost money)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chap, have expensive payments)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(item, cost money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(thing, cost money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(thing, cost money)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(item, cost money)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(thing, cost money)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(item, cost money)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chap, have expensive payments)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chap, have payments)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chap, have payments)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(chap, have payments)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(chap, cost money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chap, cost money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chap, cost money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chap, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chap, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chap, have payments)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chap, cost money)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chap, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chap, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chap, have expensive payments)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, cost money)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thing, cost money)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, cost money)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(thing, cost money)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chap, have expensive payments)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)