chap: use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.52
, friend
Weight: 0.47
, gear
Weight: 0.45
, item
Weight: 0.43
Siblings gentleman
Weight: 0.34
, young man
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.34
, postman
Weight: 0.33
, policeman
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use 1.00
is used for 0.81
is used with 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(postman, is used for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(postman, is used for)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(postman, is used for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(chap, use)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chap, is used with)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chap, is used for)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chap, is used with)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chap, is used for)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chap, is used with)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chap, is used for)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(chap, is used with)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(chap, is used for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chap, use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chap, use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chap, use)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(postman, is used for)