charge: be black in color

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.62
, officer
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings manslaughter
Weight: 0.67
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.66
, child neglect
Weight: 0.65
, penalty
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be black in color 1.00
wear white 0.84
wear white masks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(officer, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(charge, be black in color)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(officer, wear white masks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(charge, be black in color)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(officer, wear white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(officer, wear white masks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(officer, wear white)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(officer, wear white masks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(officer, wear white)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(charge, be black in color)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(officer, wear white masks)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(charge, be black in color)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(charge, be black in color)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(charge, be black in color)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(charge, be black in color)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(officer, wear white)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(officer, wear white masks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(officer, wear white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(charge, be black in color)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(officer, wear white masks)