charger: want leave

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accessory
Weight: 0.65
, product
Weight: 0.60
, electronic device
Weight: 0.58
, peripheral
Weight: 0.56
Siblings battery
Weight: 0.36
, car battery
Weight: 0.35
, lanyard
Weight: 0.35
, network device
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
want leave 1.00
go bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(battery, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(car battery, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(battery, go bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(battery, go bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(car battery, go bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(car battery, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(charger, want leave)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(charger, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(charger, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(charger, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(charger, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(charger, want leave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(charger, want leave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(battery, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(charger, want leave)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(car battery, go bad)