charity: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.60
, contribution
Weight: 0.60
, act
Weight: 0.58
Siblings homeless shelter
Weight: 0.68
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, band aid
Weight: 0.57
, orphanage
Weight: 0.55
, habitat
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good thing 0.78
has quality virtue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charity, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(homeless shelter, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(orphanage, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(good will, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(charity, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(good will, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(good will, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(orphanage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(orphanage, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(homeless shelter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(homeless shelter, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(charity, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(charity, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(charity, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(charity, has quality virtue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(charity, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(charity, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality virtue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(charity, has quality virtue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(charity, has quality virtue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charity, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(good will, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(homeless shelter, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(orphanage, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)