charles: was bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.59
, king
Weight: 0.59
, man
Weight: 0.57
, guy
Weight: 0.56
, writer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings charles darwin
Weight: 0.36
, ray charles
Weight: 0.36
, louis armstrong
Weight: 0.35
, jesse james
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad 1.00
was 1 bad king 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(charles, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(charles, was bad)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(charles, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(charles, was 1 bad king)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(charles, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(charles, was 1 bad king)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(charles, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(charles, was 1 bad king)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(charles, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(charles, was 1 bad king)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(charles, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(charles, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(charles, was bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(charles, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(charles, was bad)