chart: be effective methods of communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graph
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.62
, course
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.61
Siblings average
Weight: 0.33
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.31
, volume
Weight: 0.31
, tutorial
Weight: 0.31
, study
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be effective methods of communication 1.00
use double method 0.78
use blind method 0.78
reduce barriers to communication 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(graph, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chart, be effective methods of communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(graph, be effective methods of communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(graph, be effective methods of communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(study, reduce barriers to communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(graph, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chart, be effective methods of communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(study, reduce barriers to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(study, reduce barriers to communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chart, be effective methods of communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chart, be effective methods of communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chart, be effective methods of communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(graph, be effective methods of communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(study, reduce barriers to communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chart, be effective methods of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(graph, be effective methods of communication)