chart: cause lose

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graph
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.62
, course
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.61
Siblings average
Weight: 0.33
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.31
, volume
Weight: 0.31
, tutorial
Weight: 0.31
, study
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
cause lose 1.00
cause people 0.83
affect waterlevel 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(graph, cause people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chart, cause lose)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(graph, cause people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(graph, cause people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(graph, cause people)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chart, cause lose)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(chart, cause lose)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chart, cause people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chart, cause people)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chart, cause people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chart, cause people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chart, cause lose)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chart, cause lose)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(graph, cause people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(chart, cause lose)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(graph, cause people)