chart: read left

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graph
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.62
, course
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.61
Siblings average
Weight: 0.33
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.31
, volume
Weight: 0.31
, tutorial
Weight: 0.31
, study
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
read left 1.00
read right left 0.96
be better reading 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(graph, be better reading)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(chart, read left)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(graph, be better reading)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(graph, be better reading)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(graph, be better reading)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chart, read left)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(chart, read left)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chart, read right left)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(chart, read right left)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chart, read right left)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(chart, read right left)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(chart, read left)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(chart, read left)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(graph, be better reading)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(chart, read left)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(graph, be better reading)