chat: bans levied

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chat room
Weight: 0.64
, conversation
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.34
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.33
, tweet
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
bans levied 1.00
get levied 0.90
bans work 0.89
tend ban 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(chat, bans levied)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chat, bans work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chat, bans work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chat, get levied)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chat, bans work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(chat, tend ban)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chat, tend ban)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chat, tend ban)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chat, tend ban)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chat, get levied)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chat, get levied)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(chat, bans work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chat, get levied)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chat, bans levied)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chat, bans levied)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chat, bans levied)