cheating: be prevalent in nhl 17

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.57
, action
Weight: 0.56
, sin
Weight: 0.55
Siblings infidelity
Weight: 0.34
, adultery
Weight: 0.33
, bullying
Weight: 0.33
, cheater
Weight: 0.33
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prevalent in nhl 17 1.00
is prevalent 0.83
be rampant from india 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is prevalent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is prevalent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is prevalent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cheating, is prevalent)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cheating, is prevalent)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cheating, be rampant from india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cheating, is prevalent)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cheating, be rampant from india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cheating, be rampant from india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be rampant from india)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is prevalent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be prevalent in nhl 17) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is prevalent)