cheating: has state relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.57
, action
Weight: 0.56
, sin
Weight: 0.55
Siblings infidelity
Weight: 0.34
, adultery
Weight: 0.33
, bullying
Weight: 0.33
, cheater
Weight: 0.33
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state relationship 1.00
be in relationship 0.96
be for relationship 0.95
change relationship 0.91
be in relationships 0.86
tear apart relationship 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cheater, be in relationships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cheater, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cheater, be in relationships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cheating, has state relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cheating, be in relationship)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cheating, change relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cheating, change relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cheating, change relationship)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cheating, be in relationship)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cheating, be in relationships)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cheating, change relationship)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cheating, be for relationship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cheating, be in relationship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be for relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cheating, be for relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cheating, be in relationships)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cheating, be for relationship)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cheating, be in relationships)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cheating, tear apart relationship)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be in relationship)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cheating, tear apart relationship)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cheating, tear apart relationship)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cheating, tear apart relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cheating, has state relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cheater, be in relationships)