cheerio: be good for heart

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cereal
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.51
, favorite
Weight: 0.49
, snack
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.31
, kleenex
Weight: 0.31
, love song
Weight: 0.30
, laughing
Weight: 0.30
, remember
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for heart 1.00
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cereal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cheerio, be good for heart)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cheerio, be good for heart)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cereal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cereal, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(love song, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cereal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(love song, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(love song, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(oh, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cheerio, be good for heart)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cheerio, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cheerio, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cheerio, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cheerio, be good for heart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cereal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(love song, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(oh, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cheerio, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cereal, has quality good)