cheerio: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cereal
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.51
, favorite
Weight: 0.49
, snack
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.31
, kleenex
Weight: 0.31
, love song
Weight: 0.30
, laughing
Weight: 0.30
, remember
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste different 0.93
taste different now 0.90
smell bad 0.79
has quality good 0.79
taste like cardboard 0.78
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(brand, taste different)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cheerio, taste good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cereal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cheerio, taste good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cheerio, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(brand, taste different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cereal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(brand, taste different)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cereal, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(love song, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(brand, taste different)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cereal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cheerio, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(love song, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(love song, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(oh, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(oh, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cheerio, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cheerio, taste different)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cheerio, taste different now)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste different)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cheerio, taste different)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste different now)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cheerio, taste different now)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cheerio, taste different)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cheerio, smell bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cheerio, taste different now)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, smell bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cheerio, smell bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cheerio, taste like cardboard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cheerio, taste like cardboard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cheerio, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste like cardboard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cheerio, smell bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cheerio, taste like cardboard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cheerio, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cheerio, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cheerio, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cheerio, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cheerio, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cheerio, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(brand, taste different)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cereal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(love song, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oh, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(oh, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(brand, taste different)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cheerio, taste good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cereal, has quality good)