cheesecake: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.72
, flavor
Weight: 0.67
, cake
Weight: 0.65
, favorite
Weight: 0.60
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.39
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.38
, lasagna
Weight: 0.38
, ravioli
Weight: 0.38
, steak
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
become hard 0.88
go hard over time 0.87
be hard on outside 0.85
is tough 0.83
get tough 0.82
go tough 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(steak, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steak, is tough)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(steak, go tough)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(steak, get tough)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(steak, is hard)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steak, is hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(steak, go tough)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(steak, go tough)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(steak, is tough)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(steak, is tough)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(steak, get tough)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(steak, get tough)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cheesecake, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cheesecake, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(steak, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(steak, go tough)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, is tough)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, is hard)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(steak, get tough)