chef special: be at diner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at diner 1.00
be at restaurant 0.87
be at fancy cafe 0.77
be unique to that restaurant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chef special, be at diner)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chef special, be at restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chef special, be unique to that restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef special, be at restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(chef special, be at fancy cafe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chef special, be at fancy cafe)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(chef special, be unique to that restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(chef special, be at fancy cafe)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chef special, be at fancy cafe)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chef special, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chef special, be unique to that restaurant)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chef special, be at restaurant)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chef special, be unique to that restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chef special, be at diner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef special, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chef special, be at diner)