Dice
About
Dialogues
Browse full collection
chef special
:
be at diner
from
ConceptNet
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Related concepts
Parents
-
Siblings
-
Related properties
Property
Similarity
be at diner
1.00
be at restaurant
0.87
be at fancy cafe
0.77
be unique to that restaurant
0.75
Priors about this statement
Cues
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Joint
Necessity
Sufficiency
Implication
Entailment
Contradiction
Entropy
Evidence
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight:
0.28
Evidence weight:
0.96
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.76
Plausible(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.18
¬ Salient(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.95
Similarity weight:
0.87
Evidence:
0.51
Typical(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.10
¬ Typical(
chef special
,
be at restaurant
)
0.59
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.92
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.51
Typical(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.17
¬ Typical(
chef special
,
be unique to that restaurant
)
0.57
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.77
Similarity weight:
0.87
Evidence:
0.76
Plausible(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.96
¬ Plausible(
chef special
,
be at restaurant
)
0.55
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.83
Similarity weight:
0.77
Evidence:
0.76
Plausible(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.71
¬ Plausible(
chef special
,
be at fancy cafe
)
0.51
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.77
Similarity weight:
0.77
Evidence:
0.51
Typical(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.48
¬ Typical(
chef special
,
be at fancy cafe
)
0.50
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.78
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.76
Plausible(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.92
¬ Plausible(
chef special
,
be unique to that restaurant
)
0.45
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.67
Similarity weight:
0.77
Evidence:
0.18
Salient(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.40
¬ Salient(
chef special
,
be at fancy cafe
)
0.41
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.62
Similarity weight:
0.77
Evidence:
0.20
Remarkable(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.47
¬ Remarkable(
chef special
,
be at fancy cafe
)
0.32
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.43
Similarity weight:
0.87
Evidence:
0.20
Remarkable(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.71
¬ Remarkable(
chef special
,
be at restaurant
)
0.31
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.48
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.20
Remarkable(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.65
¬ Remarkable(
chef special
,
be unique to that restaurant
)
0.22
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.30
Similarity weight:
0.87
Evidence:
0.18
Salient(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.86
¬ Salient(
chef special
,
be at restaurant
)
0.22
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.34
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.18
Salient(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.80
¬ Salient(
chef special
,
be unique to that restaurant
)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight:
0.14
Evidence weight:
0.92
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.18
Salient(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.51
¬ Typical(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.20
¬ Remarkable(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
Typical implies Plausible
0.42
Rule weight:
0.48
Evidence weight:
0.88
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.76
Plausible(
chef special
,
be at diner
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.51
¬ Typical(
chef special
,
be at diner
)