chef special: be unique to that restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be unique to that restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.84
be at diner 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chef special, be unique to that restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef special, be at restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chef special, be at restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chef special, be at diner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chef special, be at diner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chef special, be at diner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chef special, be at restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chef special, be at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chef special, be at diner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chef special, be unique to that restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(chef special, be unique to that restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chef special, be unique to that restaurant)