chef: be in world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in world 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chef, be in world)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pianist, be in world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chef, be in world)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pianist, be in world)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pianist, be in world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chef, be in world)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chef, be in world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(chef, be in world)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chef, be in world)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chef, be in world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chef, be in world)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chef, be in world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chef, be in world)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pianist, be in world)