chef: cook for fine restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
cook for fine restaurant 1.00
cook good food 0.87
cook for person 0.86
work at restaurant 0.86
be used to cook in 0.86
be used to cook dinner 0.85
be used to cook meal 0.85
cook meal 0.85
cook food 0.85
cook dinner 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cook, cook food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cook, cook dinner)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cook, cook dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cook, cook food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cook, cook dinner)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cook, cook food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook dinner)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook meal)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cook, cook food)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cook, cook dinner)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook dinner)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook dinner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook meal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook in)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook in)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, cook for fine restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chef, cook for person)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chef, cook food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chef, cook good food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook good food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chef, work at restaurant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, work at restaurant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for person)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook dinner)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chef, cook dinner)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chef, cook dinner)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chef, cook good food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chef, work at restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chef, cook for person)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chef, cook food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chef, cook dinner)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chef, cook good food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chef, work at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, cook for person)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(chef, cook food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cook, cook food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cook, cook dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook in)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook meal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cook, cook food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cook, cook dinner)