chef: cook poorly

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
cook poorly 1.00
cook well 0.85
cook very well 0.84
wants to cook well 0.83
cook professionally 0.79
be used to cook in 0.79
cook good food 0.78
be used to cook 0.78
cook 0.77
cook cke 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cook, cook)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chef, cook poorly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cook, cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cook, cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cook, cook)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chef, cook poorly)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook in)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook in)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(chef, cook poorly)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chef, cook well)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chef, cook very well)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chef, cook)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chef, cook cke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chef, cook good food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chef, cook professionally)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook well)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook very well)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook good food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook cke)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chef, cook professionally)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chef, cook very well)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chef, cook very well)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(chef, cook well)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chef, cook good food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chef, cook cke)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chef, cook)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chef, cook well)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chef, cook good food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, cook cke)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, cook)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chef, cook poorly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, cook)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook in)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chef, cook poorly)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, cook)