chef: cook professionally

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
cook professionally 1.00
cook well 0.84
wants to cook well 0.82
cook very well 0.82
be used to cook in 0.80
be used to cook 0.80
cook 0.80
cook cke 0.80
cook poorly 0.79
be used to person who enjoy cook 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cook, cook)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chef, cook professionally)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chef, cook professionally)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cook, cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cook, cook)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cook, cook)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chef, cook professionally)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook in)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook in)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chef, cook professionally)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chef, cook well)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chef, cook)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chef, cook cke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chef, cook very well)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chef, cook poorly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook well)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook poorly)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook very well)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(chef, cook poorly)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook cke)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chef, cook very well)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(chef, cook well)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chef, cook cke)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chef, cook)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chef, cook very well)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chef, cook poorly)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chef, cook well)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, cook cke)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, cook)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chef, cook professionally)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, cook)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook in)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, cook)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(chef, cook professionally)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)