chef: have big hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big hats 1.00
have hats 0.95
is hats 0.94
wear long hats 0.91
wear hats 0.91
wear really tall hats 0.89
wear tall hats 0.88
wear funny hats 0.88
wear hat 0.86
wear white shirts 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chef, have big hats)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cook, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chef, have big hats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cook, wear tall hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(artist, wear hat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear tall hats)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(artist, wear hat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cook, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chef, have big hats)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chef, have big hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chef, have big hats)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wear hats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chef, wear long hats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(chef, wear long hats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear tall hats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chef, wear hat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chef, wear long hats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chef, wear hat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear white shirts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear long hats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, have big hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chef, have big hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cook, wear tall hats)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(artist, wear hat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cook, wear tall hats)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(chef, have big hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(artist, wear hat)