chef: stack food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
stack food 1.00
flip food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(chef, stack food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(chef, stack food)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(chef, stack food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chef, flip food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(chef, stack food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chef, flip food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(chef, stack food)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chef, flip food)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(chef, stack food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chef, flip food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(chef, stack food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, stack food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chef, stack food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(chef, stack food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, stack food)