chef: wants to cook well

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wants to cook well 1.00
cook well 0.97
cook very well 0.94
be used to cook in 0.92
be used to cook 0.92
cook 0.91
cook cke 0.91
cook good food 0.90
cook for person 0.89
be used to person who enjoy cook 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cook, cook)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, wants to cook well)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cook, cook)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cook, cook)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cook, cook)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook in)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to cook)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to cook)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wants to cook well)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook well)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chef, cook well)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chef, cook)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook very well)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chef, cook cke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chef, cook for person)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chef, cook good food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook cke)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook good food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for person)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(chef, cook well)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chef, cook very well)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chef, cook very well)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chef, cook very well)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chef, cook good food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chef, cook cke)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chef, cook)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chef, cook for person)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chef, cook well)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chef, cook good food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, cook cke)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, cook)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, cook for person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, wants to cook well)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, cook)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook in)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to cook)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, cook)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chef, wants to cook well)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, be used to person who enjoy cook)