chef: wear white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white 1.00
wear black 0.97
wear white shirts 0.92
wear white clothes 0.92
wear black gloves 0.89
traditionally wear white coats 0.87
wear shirts 0.85
wear red scarves 0.85
wear hats 0.85
wear blue check trousers 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cook, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(artist, wear black)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cook, wear black gloves)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cook, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(artist, wear black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cook, wear black gloves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear black gloves)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(artist, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cook, wear white)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(artist, wear black)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cook, wear black gloves)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(waiter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(waiter, wear black)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear black)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(musician, wear black)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(musician, wear black)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear white)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear white shirts)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear black gloves)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(chef, wear black gloves)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, wear black gloves)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wear hats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear black gloves)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, wear black gloves)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(artist, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(waiter, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(waiter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(musician, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painter, wear white clothes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(artist, wear black)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, wear black gloves)