chef: wear white shirts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white shirts 1.00
wear shirts 0.98
wear white 0.92
wear white clothes 0.92
wear black 0.90
wear uniforms 0.89
wear red scarves 0.88
have white uniforms 0.88
wear hats 0.88
wear jackets 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cook, wear white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(artist, wear black)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chef, wear white shirts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cook, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(artist, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear white)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(artist, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(painter, have white uniforms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear uniforms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cook, wear white)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(artist, wear black)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(waiter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white clothes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(waiter, wear black)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear black)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(musician, wear black)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(musician, wear black)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(painter, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(painter, wear uniforms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(painter, have white uniforms)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(painter, have white uniforms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear white shirts)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear white)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, have white uniforms)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chef, have white uniforms)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wear hats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, have white uniforms)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chef, have white uniforms)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chef, wear white shirts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(artist, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(waiter, wear black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(painter, wear uniforms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painter, wear white clothes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(waiter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painter, have white uniforms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(musician, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(artist, wear black)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear uniforms)