chemical weapon: has quality worse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.86
, arsenal
Weight: 0.66
, explosive
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.59
, substance
Weight: 0.59
Siblings nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.80
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.79
, pepper spray
Weight: 0.72
, napalm
Weight: 0.68
, agent orange
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worse 1.00
be worse than ones 0.86
has quality good 0.84
be worse than regular ones 0.83
be worse than conventional 0.82
be worse than other weapons 0.81
be worse than weapons 0.80
be worse than attacks 0.78
be worse than conventional attacks 0.76
be worse than bombs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arsenal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arsenal, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(explosive, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pepper spray, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arsenal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pepper spray, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pepper spray, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, be worse than regular ones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than regular ones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than regular ones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, be worse than ones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than ones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than ones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than ones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than regular ones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than attacks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than attacks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, be worse than attacks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than attacks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(arsenal, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pepper spray, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(arsenal, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)